不同覆盖模式对陇中干旱区扁蓿豆草地土壤酶活性的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者简介:

王玉霞(1993-),女,甘肃甘谷人,硕士研究生。E-mail:1911340132@qq.com

中图分类号:

S541.9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31760695)


Effects of different mulching patterns on soil enzymeactivities of Medicago ruthenica grassland inarid area of central Gansu
Author:
  • WANG Yu-xia

    WANG Yu-xia

    College of Grassland Science,Gansu Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem,Ministry of Education/Sino-U.S.Center for Grassland Ecosystem Sustainability /Pratacultural EngineeringLaboratory of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730070 ,China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • LIU Yao-feng

    LIU Yao-feng

    Technology Innovation Center forArtificial Grassland Planting in Arid Areas of the Loess Plateau,Ding-xi City,Long-xi 748100 ,China ;Longxi County Animal Husbandry and Veterinary TechnicalService Center,Longxi 748100 ,China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • YU Xiao-jun

    YU Xiao-jun

    College of Grassland Science,Gansu Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem,Ministry of Education/Sino-U.S.Center for Grassland Ecosystem Sustainability /Pratacultural EngineeringLaboratory of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730070 ,China ;Technology Innovation Center forArtificial Grassland Planting in Arid Areas of the Loess Plateau,Ding-xi City,Long-xi 748100 ,China
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究不同覆盖模式对陇中干旱区扁蓿豆(Medicago ruthenica)土壤酶活性的影响,以期为该地区扁蓿豆种子生产提供理论依据。于定西市安定区进行了为期3年(2017-2019年)的田间试验,以平作处理为对照,设置垄沟覆膜、地膜平覆、垄沟覆秸、平作覆秸和垄沟5种处理,研究了扁蓿豆草地土壤酶活性的变化特征。结果表明:扁蓿豆生长第2年、第3年垄沟覆秸和平作覆秸处理的土壤脲酶活性、蔗糖酶活性、碱性磷酸酶活性、纤维素酶活性和过氧化氢酶活性均显著高于其他处理。0~10 cm土层,垄沟覆膜、地膜平覆、垄沟覆秸、平作覆秸和垄沟处理与平作处理相比,生长第2年、第3年平均土壤脲酶活性分别提高了24.4%、22.6%、33.9%、26.4%和3.4%;生长第2年、第3年平均土壤纤维素酶活性分别提高了19.2%、4.9%、108.3%、105.0%和0.9%。总体来说,各处理对扁蓿豆生长第2年和第3年草地0~10 cm土层土壤酶活性影响较大,且秸秆覆盖种植的土壤酶活性最高。

    Abstract:

    The aim of this research was to understand the effects of different planting methods on soil enzyme activities of Medicago ruthenica to provide a theoretical basis for the production of M.ruthenica in the arid area of central Gansu. A three-year (2017-2019) field experiment was conducted in Anding District of Xishi City.The experiments included: parallel to the ground treatment as the control,film mulching on ridge and furrow,film mulching parallel to the ground,film straw on ridge and furrow,film straw parallel to the ground,ridge and furrow,in total of six treatments.The soil enzyme activity was characterized under each mulching condition.The results showed that the activities of urease,sucrase,alkaline phosphatase,cellulase and catalase in the second and third years of M.ruthenica growth were significantly higher with the film straw on ridge and furrow and film straw parallel to the ground than those with other mulching treatments.In the 0~10 cm soil layer,compared to the parallel to the ground control treatment,with film mulching on ridge and furrow,film mulching parallel to the ground,film straw on ridge and furrow,film straw parallel to the ground and ridge and furrow with parallel to the ground treatment,the average soil urease activity in the second and third year increased by 24.4%,22.6%,33.9%,26.4% and 3.4%,respectively.The average soil cellulase activity in the second and third years of growth increased by 19.2%,4.9%,108.3%,105.0% and 0.9% respectively.In general,each treatment had a greater impact on the soil enzyme activity in the 0~10 cm soil layer of M.ruthenica grassland in the second and third years,and the soil enzyme activity with the straw mulch planting was the highest.

    参考文献
    [1] 李鸿雁,李志勇,辛霞,等.野生扁蓿豆种质资源AFLP遗传多样性的分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2016,17(1):78-83.
    [2] 李海贤,石凤翎,王明君,等.扁蓿豆种子产量构成因子的分析[J].种子,2006,25(12):1-7.
    [3] 李海贤,石凤翎.我国扁蓿豆种子生产研究现状及提高产量的途径[J].草原与草坪,2006,26(3):14-16.
    [4] 王理德,王方琳,郭春秀,等.土壤酶学硏究进展[J].土壤,2016,48(1):12-21.
    [5] 于亚军,张浩,张子豪,等.渭北旱塬不同覆膜农田土壤微生物群落和酶活性的差异[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(11):2578-2586.
    [6] 李世朋,蔡祖聪,杨浩,等.长期定位施肥与地膜覆盖对土壤肥力和生物学性质的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2489-2498.
    [7] 徐锴,张少瑜,袁继存,等.地膜和秸秆覆盖对梨园土壤养分的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(3):421-427.
    [8] Oelbermann M,Voroney R P,Schlnvoigt A M,et al.Decomposition of Erythrinapoeppigianaleaves in3-,9-,and 18-year-old alley cropping systems in Costa Rica[J].Agroforestry Systems,2004,63:27-32.
    [9] Sommer R,Vlek P L G,DE Abreu S T D,et al.Nutri-ent balance of shifting cultivation by burning or mulching in the Eastern Amazon evidence for subsoil nutrient accumulation[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2004,68:257-271.
    [10] 梅四卫,朱涵珍,王术,等.不同覆盖方式对土壤水肥热状况以及玉米产量影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(4):68-73.
    [11] 马育军,李小雁,伊万娟,等.沟垄集雨结合砾石覆盖对沙棘生长的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(S2):188-194.
    [12] 王根旺,宋曦.陇东黄土高原地区杏园土壤综合肥力对人工生草模式的响应及其环境解释[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(4):29-39.
    [13] 邓浩亮,张恒嘉,肖让,等.陇中半干旱区不同覆盖种植方式对土壤水热效应和玉米产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(2):273-287.
    [14] 谢成俊,王平,陈娟.不同覆盖方式对农田土壤水热状况及马铃薯产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2019,50(5):1151-1158.
    [15] 常磊,韩凡香,柴雨葳,等.秸秆带状覆盖对半干旱雨养区冬小麦耗水特征和产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(12):4150-4158.
    [16] 王玉霞,柴锦隆,周洋洋,等.种植方式对陇中干旱区扁蓿豆种子产量及构成因素的影响[J].草业学报,2021,20(8):1-14
    [17] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定方法[M],北京:科学出版社,1978:140-148.
    [18] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
    [19] 宋婷婷,刘斌,寇燕燕,等.起垄覆膜方式对旱作马铃薯栽培土壤酶活性的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,2019(4):52-56.
    [20] 赵德英.梨园树盘覆盖的土壤生态效应及树体生理响应研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2013:8-68
    [21] 罗玲,钟奇,刘伟,等.地面覆盖对避雨葡萄园土壤水分、温度及酶活性的影响[J].核农学报,2020,34(12):2839-2849.
    [22] 徐凌飞,韩清芳,吴中营,等.清耕和生草梨园土壤酶活性的空间变化[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(23):4977-4982.
    [23] 王艳.养分管理与耕作措施对旱地土壤碳消长过程影响的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2008:8-22.
    [24] 张登奎,王琦.垄沟集雨覆盖种植对土壤水分特征及红豆草生长特性的影响[J].草原与草坪,2019,39(3):26-34.
    [25] 陈和平,窦俊焕,郭天顺,等.甘肃中部高寒区覆盖栽培对马铃薯土壤酶活性及产量变化影响[J].中国马铃薯,2019,33(1):21-27.
    [26] 韩国君,何明珠,黄海霞,等.黄土高原不同种植年限苜蓿地土壤酶活性的季节性变化研究[J].草原与草坪,2018,38(5):59-64.
    [27] 崔雯雯,宋全昊,高小丽,等.糜子不同种植方式对土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(1):234-240.
    [28] Taylor J P,Wilson B,Mills M S,et al.Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2002,34(3):387-401.
    [29] 王理德,姚拓,王方琳,等.石羊河下游退耕地土壤微生物变化及土壤酶活性[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4769-4779.
    [30] Sillen W M A,Thijs S,Abbamondi G R,et al.Effects of silver nanoparticles on soil microorganisms and maize biomass are linked in the rhizosphere[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2015,91(12):14-22.
    [31] 宁沐蕾,高唤唤,黄天颖,等.崇明岛土地利用方式对土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(7):1949-1956.
    [32] 关松荫,沈桂琴,孟昭鹏,等.我国主要土壤剖面酶活性状况[J].土壤学报,1984,21(4):368-381.
    [33] 罗影,王立光,陈军,等.不同种植模式对甘肃中部高寒区胡麻田土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响[J].核农学报,2017,31(6):1185-1191.
    [34] 孙建,刘苗,李立军,等.免耕与留茬对土壤微生物量C、N及酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5508-5513.
    [35] Luo Y J,Wang Z F,Gao M,et al.Effects of conservation tillage on organic carbon,nitrogen and enzyme activities in a hydragricanthrosol of Chongqing,China[J].Energy Procedia,2011,5:30-36.
    [36] 张英英,蔡立群,武均,等.不同耕作措施下陇中黄土高原旱作农田土壤活性有机碳组分及其与酶活性间的关系[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(1):1-7.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

王玉霞,刘耀峰,鱼小军.不同覆盖模式对陇中干旱区扁蓿豆草地土壤酶活性的影响[J].草原与草坪,2022,(1):102-110

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:31
  • 下载次数: 264
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-26
文章二维码